Myrka Dellanos’ exit from the program La mesa caliente did not go unnoticed and, far from closing a chapter discreetly, the renowned journalist decided to break her silence with statements that have generated an intense debate in the world of show business and the media.
His words portray a tense work environment, marked -according to his version- by ideological differences, internal censorship and conflicts that had been dragging on for months.
Dellanos assures that her experience within the program was increasingly complicated, as she felt isolated for defending positions different from those of her colleagues. In her statements, she affirmed that she was the one who tried to bring balance to the conversations, while the rest of the panel maintained an editorial line that, in her opinion, favored a specific political vision.
Myrka Dellanos: Ideological Differences and Tension Moments
According to the journalist, friction increased when sensitive political topics were discussed, especially those related to the United States, Mexico and drug trafficking. Myrka said that in one of the broadcasts she tried to present information she considered relevant, but she was constantly interrupted by her colleagues, who -according to her- reacted with discomfort and prevented her from developing her full argument in front of the audience.
This episode, she said, made her feel publicly discredited, as she perceived that the objective was to minimize her position and project her in a negative light before viewers. For Dellanos, that moment marked a breaking point in her professional relationship with the team.
One of the strongest accusations made by the host was the alleged inconsistency between what was discussed off-camera and what was finally said on the air. According to her testimony, in previous meetings many of her colleagues agreed with her ideas, but avoided expressing them publicly so as not to generate controversy or external conflicts.
In addition, Dellanos assured that on some occasions information was disseminated that, from her perspective, was not completely truthful, a situation that led her to express her disagreement. “I don’t sell myself for money,” she said, stressing that her priority has always been to maintain her professional credibility and respect for the public.
She also revealed that, for a prolonged period, she ceased to have control over her own texts and comments, being forced to read scripts that did not reflect her personal opinion, which she considered a form of professional limitation.
A dismissal under restructuring
Finally, the journalist explained that her departure from the program was officially justified as part of a “restructuring”, although she believes that the decision was influenced by the accumulated tensions and her firm stance against certain contents.
Far from regretting it, Dellanos said she felt at peace and proud of having defended her principles, even if it meant losing her space on the program. For her, closing this cycle represents an opportunity to rethink her professional path without compromising her ethics and freedom of expression.
Meanwhile, the statements continue to generate reactions among followers, colleagues and analysts of the media, rekindling the debate on the plurality of opinions and editorial freedom within television opinion programs.
Here are the controversial statements made by Myrka Dellanos.
Find out more at ‘QueOnnda.com’.
